Friday’s release by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics for the January Jobs Report was
highly anticipated by nearly everyone -- including President Trump and his team. It was
to be, for them, a vindication for his business friendly policies, and also to tag onto his
key piece of legislation, the tax reform bill, but it was also eagerly anticipated by those
that wanted to see one key piece of news: a wage increase.
The report did not disappoint -- it showed that the economy added 200,000 jobs, much
more than the 180,000 anticipated, and the bonus was that average hourly wages
increased to 2.9 percent, a welcome bump of 0.3percent from a figure that seemed on
hold for several previous months at 2.5 percent.
This is a welcome change from the unwelcome images of income inequality that spilled
from the media, and also led to political upheaval, even turmoil, said many.
Wages represent the real test of our economic strength and getting there, as we noted
previously is half the battle and in earlier months there was optimism, when last month,
it was noted by Business Insider that “Economists, however, remain optimistic that
wage growth will accelerate with the labor market near full employment. The
unemployment rate, which has declined by 0.7 percentage point since January, is now
at its lowest level since December 2000 and below the Fed’s median forecast for 2017.”
Leading, or perhaps even lauding, the good news was economist Joseph Brusuelas
who told Fortune Magazine that this would signal the “tightest labor market in a
generation.”
The headline number remained at 4.1 percent, the lowest it has been since December
2000. The combination is likely, say observers, to lead to a March interest rate increase
of a quarter-point, by the Federal Reserve, under the new chair Jay Powell.
The usual disclaimer is still present: the headline, or marquee number, does not include
those that want a job, but have given up, discouraged workers, or those that are not of
working age; or those that want full time employment, but are stuck in part-time jobs; It
does, by definition, include those that are simply unemployed and looking for work.
The good news is also that the discouraged worker rate has fallen by 15 percent in the
last year.
While the champagne corks popped in many quarters, others were less sanguine, as
they considered a Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.7 percent, that has been steady
for four months, with seemingly no abatement to come.
In 2000, the rate peaked at 67.3, but was depressed by long term joblessness, and the
aforementioned discouraged workers.
The downward spiral has many reasons, and one
is the continued opioid crisis, that has given the LFPR a 20 percent drop, say
employers.
Going further some have even said that the rate has been nibbled away by those that
have claimed disability, often by jobseekers lacking relevant skills; and this was joined
by the fact that Baby Boomers have retired at a steady clip, with younger workers filling
the void, but not always, “shovel ready” as employers say that many of them lack the
skills and education needed to perform.
To fill that void, some employers are lowering standards, including hiring those that test
positive on marijuana, or lack requisite skills and need that “in-house” training, but
mostly occurring in lower wage jobs.
In fact, the largest increases were in bars and restaurant work, 31,000; health care
(mostly lower-salaried aides) at 21,000; and manufacturing, of 15,000, welcome news,
but most economists are taking a wait and see approach, as these numbers are subject to revision.
In a unique turnabout some employers are paying them increased wages after training
them, and then, and only then, increasing wages giving employers an advantage, but
simultaneously saving money.
Market Watch reported that “Dan North, chief economist at Euler Hermes North
America, says a labor shortage has reached the critical stage.” He says that employers are “desperate for potential
employees who have skills, or at the least, who can pass a drug test.”
“Companies are having to hiring unskilled people at unskilled wages, and train them.
That’s part of the reason wages remain weak.," he emphasized.
While the White House seems to suggest that they have the wherewithal with this new
bill to increase these overall numbers, some economists are saying this short-term
boost from a deficit funded legislation is not enough, and that what is needed is an
examination of the social causes of worker discouragement.
No comments:
Post a Comment