In the one month since the Parkland school shootings in South
Florida, students across the nation protested on Wednesday in mass walkouts for
17 minutes, one for each victim that was shot and killed at Marjory Stoneman
Douglas High School.
These events, billed by
youth organizers as National Walkout Day, underscored a united push for
political action to address the seemingly “relentless outbreak of mass
shootings in the U.S.” said HuffPost Politics in their coverage, and
also reported that, “Participants in the National School Walkout, a massive protest
organized by Youth EMPOWER, a branch of young activists
affiliated with the Women’s March, called on Congress to pass stricter gun
laws.”
Soon after the
shootings, last month, a youth response began from the surviving students and
has quickly spread across the country, calling for change in gun laws, to help
protect students from gunman like Florida shooter, Nicholas Cruz, who was able
to buy a gun under the age of 21, a change that students want along with
expanded background checks.
From coast to coast,
this movement has garnered not only national attention but an increasing
grassroots movement that hopes to effect change in what many see as an inadequate response from President Donald Trump and the
National Rifle Association, which is opposed to additional measures
such as the banning of bump stocks; a device that was used by the Las Vegas shooter to “bump” up his
ability to fire round after round of ammunition into concert goers at a
country music event this past summer.
Some students may face disciplinary issues for the walkout -- and some are being told that they will be marked absent in response, but they have also been advised by the ACLU that being given punitive discipline for the walkout beyond, being marked absent, would be wrong..
Support has also come
from Black Lives Matter leaders who tweeted: “Salute to students walking out
today despite consequences imposed by educators who failed Civics Class! Salute
to Black and Brown students reminding folks today that they want to be safe as
well and want all students to be safe, just not in ways that criminalize them.”
They are referring to
those student protests that have been expanded to those black and brown
students whose lives are endangered every day, living and studying in urban
areas, such as Chicago, New York City and Baltimore.
In response, students in
Wisconsin marched to their capital, Madison in protest. And in Chicago,
students marched in solidarity with the others and in a statement by
organizers, said: “A new collective of Baltimore and Chicago students who call
themselves GoodKidsMaddCity and use the hashtag #BmoreChi.
Over 1,500 students and
teachers from schools across Baltimore and Chicago, who have lost loved ones to
gun violence . . . recently met with Parkland students," and it seemed that the intersection of class and privilege is also being crossed. Acknowledging
the lived reality of these students, organizers also said: “Students of color
from cities that have been impacted by gun violence will be adding their voices
to the national call to action to address root causes of gun violence that
impact their lives on a daily basis”
Noting that there have longstanding calls “for increased
investment in health, education, youth employment, and other community
resources as proactive solutions to decrease gun violence, yet these demands
have largely fallen on deaf ears the local, state, and national levels” the
organizers expanded their concerns.
When Parkland students survivors met last week with Chicago youth,
Emma Gonzalez acknowledged, “Those who face gun violence on a level that we
have only just glimpsed from our gated communities have never had their voices
heard in their entire lives the way that we have in these few weeks alone.”
Much of the continuing disinvestment has seemed to have increased under Mayor Rahm Emanuel, and the result is that “. . . over the past 8 years communities which have been impacted by high unemployment and violence have only seen divestment of critical resources; for example during his first term, “Chicago saw the closing of almost half the city’s mental health clinics, in addition to ongoing cuts to social services and after school programming as a result of a lack of State budget for almost three years,” not to mention closing 50 schools in mostly black neighborhoods.
The recent school
closings in the Englewood neighborhood have also faced mounting criticism, to the
seeming gentrification and the change in an award winning elementary school, the National Teachers Academy, on
the city’s near South Side, transitioning to a high school seems to underscore
the point of anger. And, as many
sociologists have emphasized schools anchor a neighborhood, in addition to their
dedicated task of educating and training a new generation.
Some glaring statistics:
“In Chicago, the unemployment rate for African-American youth was at 43 percent
in 2017, and according to data from the Chicago Tribune, 1,619 young people
under the age of 17 have been shot since 2011.”
Student-led
demonstrations around the country and the dozens of separate events at
Episcopal cathedrals and churches coincided March 14 to mark one month since
the deadly high school shooting in Parkland, Florida.
“This is the only nation
in the world that has a gun death problem at the rate we do,” New Jersey Bishop
Chip Stokes said in his sermon at Eucharist held at Trinity Episcopal Cathedral
in Trenton. “Those of us who oppose it need to get in the face of the problem
and cry out in the name of the Lord.”
On the religious front,
“Episcopalians gathered in Springfield, Massachusetts, outside a Smith &
Wesson facility to rally behind protest signs that asked the gun manufacturer
to “Stop Selling Assault Weapons, noted Episcopalian News Service, who also
reported that, “Students of Episcopal schools from New York to Florida walked
out of class to participate in a nationwide call to action.”
The largest, or at least
the most visible, of the protests was the one that took place in Washington,
D.C where a student said: “Their right to own an assault rifle does not
outweigh our right to live. The adults have failed us. This is in our hands
now, and if any elected official gets in our way, we will vote them out.”
Returning to Illinois,
the Chicago Sun-Times reported “Gov. Bruce
Rauner said Tuesday he and his aides were “working feverishly” to study the gun
dealer licensing bill before he decided to veto it because “it was going to
create a big layer of burden and bureaucracy, and really not keep our
communities safer.”
Belying his critics that said the decision had to do mostly with political posturing, the governor said in defense while,” Speaking after a campaign stop in Naperville, the governor insisted his decision had nothing to do with trying to shore up conservative support a week before the primary.
“Not at all,” Rauner told the Chicago Sun-Times. “What we are focused on is winning in November against Pritzker and Madigan, and our message is a unifying message. It’s the right policy that everybody wants.”
Belying his critics that said the decision had to do mostly with political posturing, the governor said in defense while,” Speaking after a campaign stop in Naperville, the governor insisted his decision had nothing to do with trying to shore up conservative support a week before the primary.
“Not at all,” Rauner told the Chicago Sun-Times. “What we are focused on is winning in November against Pritzker and Madigan, and our message is a unifying message. It’s the right policy that everybody wants.”
Going even further
Rauner stated, “Our team has been working feverishly, studying, talking, doing
our due diligence on what other states have done, what’s the law here, and what
it would do to our small shop owners,” further expanding on a campaign stop, to
say: “And we just decided it was going to create a big layer of burden and
bureaucracy, and really not keep our communities safer. And so we decided let’s
go ahead and veto the bill.”
With the powerful
National Rifle Association fighting hard against proposed changes, “One of the
bill’s chief sponsors, State Sen. Don Harmon, D-Oak Park, on Tuesday accused
Rauner of being a “lap dog” for the National Rifle Association “rather than
listen to the people he represents.”
Utilizing their age-old
defense “the NRA in turn said the bill created “dramatic overreaches
specifically designed to close as many Illinois federally licensed firearm
dealers as possible.”
Ramping up the rhetoric was NRA spokesman Lars Dalseide, who said, in another statement: “Now it’s up to the law-abiding gun owners of Illinois to let their lawmakers know this type of infringement on their Second Amendment Rights is completely unacceptable,” and “Punishing legitimate businesses for the criminal actions of others is a prime example of why communities continue to suffer as their elected officials focus on headlines instead of the real problem; actual criminals.”
Ramping up the rhetoric was NRA spokesman Lars Dalseide, who said, in another statement: “Now it’s up to the law-abiding gun owners of Illinois to let their lawmakers know this type of infringement on their Second Amendment Rights is completely unacceptable,” and “Punishing legitimate businesses for the criminal actions of others is a prime example of why communities continue to suffer as their elected officials focus on headlines instead of the real problem; actual criminals.”
Backing up these claims
the Illinois
Rifle Association said, partly, in a statement, that “Bloomberg and his henchmen
have now enlisted an army of impressionable children to do his
anti-constitutional dirty work. Too old and tired for trench warfare
themselves, the likes of Schumer, Harmon, and Pelosi are exploiting the energy
of our young people to fulfill the aging anti-gunners’ bucket list.
Using the fear that gun owners would lose their guns, under any changes, they said: “Cynically titled the “March for Our Lives,” Saturday’s events would be more properly dubbed, “March for Your Guns.” Organizers of these events are demanding legislation that would ban and confiscate nearly every gun you own, repeal concealed carry, and leave you with nothing in your safe but your grandma’s silverware.”
Using the fear that gun owners would lose their guns, under any changes, they said: “Cynically titled the “March for Our Lives,” Saturday’s events would be more properly dubbed, “March for Your Guns.” Organizers of these events are demanding legislation that would ban and confiscate nearly every gun you own, repeal concealed carry, and leave you with nothing in your safe but your grandma’s silverware.”
They then urged supporters to attend any, all local rallies to counter
protest to the threat to Second Amendment Rights.
In response, State Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago) defended the
protests and said, in a statement from
her office: “I strongly condemn the incendiary, misleading rhetoric of the
Illinois State Rifle Association regarding the March for Our Lives this
weekend. As anyone following the news over the last several weeks knows, these
nationwide marches are a result of high school kids after Parkland being
unwilling to sit back and watch politicians do nothing when their schools are
shot up by battlefield weaponry.”
“It is ridiculous bordering on disturbingly paranoid to pretend
that Michael Bloomberg and Nancy Pelosi are somehow behind these actions. The
kids are not trying to repeal concealed carry. They’re not trying to raid
anyone’s gun safe. They just want to go to school without fear that a disturbed
teenager can buy a weapon designed for war at the corner gun shop and commence
the kind of slaughter we’ve seen repeatedly.”
Cassidy also called for a retraction, saying that “They must
retract their statement and issue another reminding [their] members that if
they attend a march, their actions must be confined to speech alone.”
In a related move, north suburban Deerfield, Ill, recently passed
legislation approving a unanimous “ban on certain types of assault weapons and
high-capacity magazines, amending a 2013 ordinance that regulated the storage
of those items,” the Tribune also reported.
“The new ordinance prohibits the possession, sale and
manufacturing of certain types of assault weapons and large capacity magazines
within the village, according to the ordinance,” and “Violations carry a fine
of between $250 and $1,000 per day, according to Matthew Rose, the village
attorney. He said the fine is levied each day until there is compliance.”
Echoing the sentiments of her national peers, “Ariella Kharasch, a
Deerfield High School senior who favors the legislation, said she wants more
action both on a local and national level. “This is our fight,” Kharasch said.
“This is our generation’s fight. We’re going to keep fighting and this is part
of it. Change happens gradually step by step. The fight does not end at the
borders of our village.”
No comments:
Post a Comment