U.S. Capitol |
In
less than 100 days, the U.S. Congressional midterm elections will be
held - Nov. 6, to be exact - and the that date is one that both the White
House, and the Republicans, and especially the Democrats, are counting on to
either stay the course, or change the leadership, and by default Congressional
partisan behavior. While those who identify as being anti-Trump have grown by
leaps and bounds, President Trump has also taken to increasing his political
rallies, and tweets, to his gain, or has he?
In a
time honored tradition in American politics, this event has shown to be one
that takes the temperature of the party, and person, in power; and, the results
can be startling, often to the extreme, as was seen with the 63 percent change
in the House of Representatives in the Obama administration, with voters
alternatively confused, or angered by the Affordable Care Act, known
colloquially as Obama Care.
Paling,
but no less significant was the 31 percent and historic change under George W.
Bush; but November’s outcome also will be revelatory, as the country has seen
the reshaping of the Republican party, by Trump, as he has radicalized the once
mainstream conservative party; and while it was won him praise by that
steadfast 36 percent of supporters, it also shows a dip in his overall approval
ratings of 40 percent, a not insignificant number, as a fulcrum for some
anxious forecasting.
Debate
has centered in one area: the infamous and
dangerous comments Trump made, next to a smiling Russian President Vladimir
Putin, as he heard the U.S. leader trample the American intelligence community
which identified Russia as electronically penetrating private computer
systems, and social media sites, in supporting Trump against Hillary Clinton in
the 2016 presidential election.
For
the president to counter a blue wave, he has to demonstrate to the American
electorate, that under his watch, the country has improved. While, some
observers and politicos say he can do that, and on many fronts, he can, but to
others his often frequent rampages against members of Congress, and not to
mention foreign leaders he has undermined the effort, say many of his most
ardent supporters.
The
stock market has picked up significantly since his election, he has legions of
supporters championing his tax
plan,
as fractured as the individual gains may be, and seeing the near full employment
figure of 4 percent, the joy emanating from the White House, has been undermined
by an increase in tariffs which has alienated a strong
part of his base, farmers, who
overwhelmingly say that the imported steel has hurt their profits through
greater cost of vital equipment, made of steel; and foremost significant chunks
of a profitable export business to China, to whet their appetite for parts of
the pig that are not popular in the U.S. market.
Hillary Clinton |
In
response, some strategists are saying that it is vital that the Dems stake out
issues, as opposed to “hate Trump rhetoric.”
And, there is significant support for this view: “Our candidates are not
going to lead with talking about Trump,” said Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D).
“They’re going to lead by talking about economic growth and improving
education. You don’t have to
mention Trump very much,” reported The Hill.
Still,
other critics say, that the change will take some coaxing -- yet others insist
that there is not. On the table for swinging the conversation to issues are:
the potential loss of insurance coverage for those with pre-existing conditions
(after the draconian changes to the ACA, by the GOP) and public schools whose
per pupil funding in inequitable areas, as in Chicago, before
recent legislation; not to mention school safety after the Parkland massacres
and a general tilt towards undermining public education by Betsy DeVos.
Handling
Trump seems to be an impossible task, and while many have tried, such as Chief
of Staff, Gen. John Kelly, Trump continues on a mad Twitter rage against
respected world leaders, and allies, such as German Chancellor, Angela Merkel,
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and British Prime Minister Theresa May;
undermining his position, if not his base.
“The economy and tax reform
isn’t an abstract issue like Russia,” said Ryan Williams, a New Hampshire
Republican operative who advised Mitt
Romney. “I wish the president
would talk every day about the economy and tax reform instead of other things
he talks about. It distracts from the success story.”
Cries of “fake news” and
describing the special investigation of Bob Mueller as a “witch hunt” that adds
only further to the burden of some Republicans facing a tough battle to retain
their seats. And, some don’t want to be associated with talks of disbanding
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, presidential impeachment, fearing
political fallout.
What
remains is a numbers game, and “Democrats have a clear edge over Republicans in voter
enthusiasm. A June survey from the Pew Research Center showed Democratic voters were five points more likely
than Republicans to say they were more excited to vote this year than in
previous midterms, mirroring other surveys that show Democratic enthusiasm at
higher levels than the GOP.”
“But their edge is not as
significant as the winning party’s advantage in the last two major wave
elections, in 2010 and 2006. Eight years ago, Republicans held a 15-point
enthusiasm edge, and they picked up 63 Democratic-held seats in former
President Obama’s first midterm election.
Four years before that, Democrats had a 32-point enthusiasm gap, and the party picked up 30 seats.
“Democrats are angry, and that’s not changing in the next 100 days,” said Ron Klain, a Democratic strategist and former chief of staff to Vice Presidents Joe Biden and Al Gore. “The unknown is whether that anger turns into a huge turnout.”
Four years before that, Democrats had a 32-point enthusiasm gap, and the party picked up 30 seats.
“Democrats are angry, and that’s not changing in the next 100 days,” said Ron Klain, a Democratic strategist and former chief of staff to Vice Presidents Joe Biden and Al Gore. “The unknown is whether that anger turns into a huge turnout.”
Go
deep, is an age-old football plea, and again, The Hill, is saying: “In 2014,
when Democrats led the generic ballot in both CNN and NBC/Wall Street Journal
surveys by only slim margins, Republicans ended up winning 13 Democratic-held
seats. The last time Democrats gained significantly, in 2006, the party held a
15-point advantage in both surveys.
By contrast, Republicans enjoyed a generic ballot advantage of between two and six points in late October 2010, according to CNN and NBC/Wall Street Journal polls, but that narrow edge still resulted in the 63-seat gain.”
By contrast, Republicans enjoyed a generic ballot advantage of between two and six points in late October 2010, according to CNN and NBC/Wall Street Journal polls, but that narrow edge still resulted in the 63-seat gain.”
On
the forefront, is the growing corps of
female candidates, that as we have seen, has give significant victories in a
Georgia primary, and a
special election in Alabama, and the latter supported by a legion of
tightly organized black female voters.
Vox.com recently
reported that “A prominent elections forecaster just tilted predictions in eight
key House races away from male Republican candidates toward female Democratic
contenders, seven of whom are challenging incumbent men. It’s another sign that
2018 could be a big year for women in politics, particularly Democratic women.”
“Larry
Sabato of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics moved 17 races that
he tracks from strongly favoring Republicans closer toward Democrats.
Only one of the 17 seats is currently held by a woman. Two more Republican women, facing male Democratic challengers, are running for seats left open by congressmen who retired. In all, 12 races include a female candidate. Eight of the 17 races moved away from a likely Republican male winner toward a Democratic woman.”
Only one of the 17 seats is currently held by a woman. Two more Republican women, facing male Democratic challengers, are running for seats left open by congressmen who retired. In all, 12 races include a female candidate. Eight of the 17 races moved away from a likely Republican male winner toward a Democratic woman.”
Stacey Abrams |
Running is not winning, “But in the 2018
primaries, female candidates have been outperforming their male counterparts, multiple
analyses have found. More than 40 percent of Democratic nominees for the US
House of Representatives so far are women, according to an NBC News analysis. Meanwhile, fewer than 10 percent of
Republican nominees are women, NBC found.”
“Put another way, Democratic female candidates
are over performing by about 15 percent in primaries, the
Cook Political Report found. In other words, female candidates in 2018 are more likely to defeat male candidates than the other way around, they
summarized.
“For
all the ups and downs of polling, the reality is Democrats around the country
continue to over-perform, often significantly, in special elections. Moreover,
we’ve seen stronger than average turnout in primaries,” said Steve Schale, a
Florida-based Democratic consultant.
Less
sanguine are those that are not quite ready to concede to the Democrats, at
least as this point.
“Democrats
may not be ahead right now in enough races to win” the House, said Tom Davis, a
former chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee. “The
Democrats aren’t winning, but they’ve moved these
things to single-digit races.”
One
thing that the Dems will have to do to score those 25 seats in the House is to
get out the vote, to at least hit 32 points.
The
next few weeks will be critical for both sides, but especially the Democrats,
as they face many of their voters who see a midterm elections as “off year” and
unimportant, preferring to only vote in presidential elections.
No comments:
Post a Comment