The December Jobs report released on Friday practically leapt off the
monitors, and onto the laps of waiting officials, and newsmakers, with the
trumpets blaring that there were 312,000 non-farm jobs gained, when there were
only expectations of 180,000, and the unemployment rate was 3.9, up from 3.7,
on the household side.
Some
optimists have noted, that wages are on the “higher side of a moderate to
moderate pace,” but that might be more than a glass full.
That
was only one voice, as others said, “Hey, hold on, not so fast that banner rate
of 3.9 percent unemployment is OK,, but not that much better than November, and
besides, everyone knows that the household survey is more accurate, and that is
just a tad over 7 percent.”
Another
voice in the crowd says, “Well that’s all good, but even better is that these
numbers represent real employment, and after all, isn’t that what we’re all
about Alfie?”
Bringing
up the rear was this: “I don’t want to take all of the joy out of America’s
hearts, but what about wages? That 3.2, is only a paltry increase. Show me the
money, and then we can talk!”
From
the Rose Garden of the White House, President Trump exclaimed, ““312,000 jobs
was a tremendous number and obviously having a big impact on the stock market
today,” he said, adding that the pickup in wage growth was “beautiful to
watch.”
The hardnosed
truth is that all of these voices are present, and while real wages, are not
what they need to be, or even should be, it’s better than previous months, is
the best said.
Cheering
on the news was Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who noted that the Fed would not move
quickly to raise rates unlike last tear.
Not
to be outdone, but joining the Hallelujah Chorus was the usual cast of bankers
and economist, and here is a small, yet sturdy, selection of comments culled from The New
York Times.
“It’s
an unequivocally phenomenal report all the way around,” said Ellen Zentner,
chief United States economist at Morgan Stanley. “Anyone that finds something
negative in this report is simply cherry picking.”
Economists offered raves that could appear on a movie poster or a book jacket — “Extraordinary!” “Blowout,” “Wow!” The figures, they said, offer a resounding response to the question of whether a recession is imminent: “Never mind!” said David Berson, chief economist of Nationwide. “The fears of the economy tipping into a recession now have clearly been overstated.”
Economists offered raves that could appear on a movie poster or a book jacket — “Extraordinary!” “Blowout,” “Wow!” The figures, they said, offer a resounding response to the question of whether a recession is imminent: “Never mind!” said David Berson, chief economist of Nationwide. “The fears of the economy tipping into a recession now have clearly been overstated.”
Wages,
as previously noted, are still a problem, for many, yet the report gave hope to
many, but as we have noted in previous months, with the banner number this
high, there should be higher wages, at least hitting 4 percent, or higher. The
reasons, why we are not seeing them, is due to a number of factors: the mega
employers, like Amazon are depressing wages with their global eight; employers
are still seeing a lack of the right skill set, for the jobs that need to fill;
and, higher wages are being given to those who change jobs, and have the right
skills, but those that remain are being paid the same old wages.
The
gap between education and experience has continued unabated, and that gap is particularly vexing to
“the finance and insurance industries [who] are the most apt to see education
and training as the largest impediments to hiring: 63 percent single this out
as the primary reason.”
“In
December, private sector workers (excluding farmworkers) got an average 11-cent
hourly raise, adding up to an average hourly pay of $27.48. That’s a tiny bump,
and reflects more of the slow wage growth that has plagued the economy in
recent years. In the past 12 months, average hourly earnings have only
increased 84 cents, or 3.2 percent, and that doesn’t even take inflation into
account,” noted Vox.com.
“Wages,
which for months only inched up, have begun to pick up more quickly. December’s
year-over-year increase hit 3.2 percent, tying October for the biggest surge
since 2009”, noted the Times.
Let’s
go even further, as the good folks at Vox, said, “Over the past year, prices rose, so paychecks had to
stretch further. When the 2.2
percent inflation rate is taken into account (based
on the Consumer
Price Index), workers’ wages only grew about 1
percent within the past year.”
“The price index for personal-consumption
expenditures, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge, rose 1.8% from a
year earlier in November, the latest month for which data is available,” noted
the Wall Street Journal.
They
also noted that “the recovery has gone on for so long that it has finally begun
to benefit the lowest-paid workers, who have seen the biggest pay gains.” But, then that is not news, we have seen that
for the last two months, and while this is helpful, it does not define the
market.
A
significant bright spot, continuing from August, is the increase in hiring
for job seekers with only a secondary education. And some employers are
decreasing requirements, overlooking lesser marijuana convictions, and even
giving employees greater control over their schedule, as a further hiring
incentive.
Overall,
it will be hard to try and define the market, and while some are giving laud,
others are taking a cautionary note, for example: "When we look at the job
market, it's a bit of a counterpoint to the tremendous amount of volatility we
see elsewhere in the economy, and essentially in society," Bankrate.com
senior economic analyst Mark Hamrick tells
CNBC Make It.
He adds that while the current jobs report does provide some measure of comfort, job seekers should be mindful of a possible hiring slowdown due to risk factors like rising interest rates, trade war tensions and a low stock market.”
He adds that while the current jobs report does provide some measure of comfort, job seekers should be mindful of a possible hiring slowdown due to risk factors like rising interest rates, trade war tensions and a low stock market.”
Weighing
opportunity and risk may be the best effort for workers, and check bank
reserves and keep a constant network for that rainy day that might be around
the corner.
What
is not around the corner is the resignation of Jay Powell, the Fed Chair, that
has been under so much fire and vitriol from President Trump, who has publicly
criticized him. He told reporters, when asked whether he would resign if Trump
asked him to, Mr. Powell simply said, “No.”
“Wall Street’s enthusiastic response to the jobs numbers was magnified by Mr. Powell’s comments. The S&P 500 index closed up more than 3 percent,” which was gleefully reported, again, by the Times.
“Wall Street’s enthusiastic response to the jobs numbers was magnified by Mr. Powell’s comments. The S&P 500 index closed up more than 3 percent,” which was gleefully reported, again, by the Times.
“Powell’s
statement that he’s willing to adjust central bank policy, if needed,
represents a step back from a dogmatic determination to raise interest rates
and is a concession to financial markets, said Andrew Brenner, head of global
fixed income at Nat Alliance Securities.”
“We will be prepared to adjust policy quickly and flexibly and use all of our tools to support the economy should that be appropriate,” Mr. Powell said in response to recent volatility that has jolted financial markets.
“He’s blinking, big time,” Mr. Brenner said.
“We will be prepared to adjust policy quickly and flexibly and use all of our tools to support the economy should that be appropriate,” Mr. Powell said in response to recent volatility that has jolted financial markets.
“He’s blinking, big time,” Mr. Brenner said.
On
the global side, China is facing an economic downturn, which can dampen trade,
and its existing tariff war with Washington doesn't help; and the U.S. auto
industry faces a possible downturn with the advent of driverless vehicles, and
demand for electric cars.
Taking
a cue from the Cassandras of a few months ago, “On Thursday, the Institute for
Supply Management released a survey showing the biggest drop in manufacturing
activity since 2008. Many manufacturers blamed rising costs related to tariffs.
(The index reading of 54.1 still showed an economy in expansion.) Measures of
consumer confidence have also weakened recently.”
Underemployment
is still a factor and the share of people who have part-time positions but
would prefer to work full time is higher today than it was in 2007, before the
Great Recession.
Labor force participation is continuing a downward slide, “a far smaller share of the American population is working today than before the recession. That decline is partly because of the aging of the baby boom generation. But even among people in their prime working years, employment is down from before the recession, and far below its peak at the height of the dot-com boom.”
We
noted last month that there is also a gender gap, with more women working, than
men and some observers, wondering what is needed to get men off the sidelines.
But, wages are a part of the problem, and some, though not all women, are
either working part-time to supplement the family balance sheet, or accepting
lower pay.
No comments:
Post a Comment