November Jobs Report is shaken, but not stirred

Continuing the slowdown for the American job market the Labor Department released November employment figures on Tuesday consistent with what we have seen for the last several months: the US took a loss of 106,000 jobs, and a gain of only 64,000 jobs with an unemployment figure of 4.6 percent the largest seen in four years; but, due to the government shutdown it does not contain the usual snapshot, and some economists see the figures as shaky with the lack of not only the snapshot, but also the data collection from the household survey, methods lacking the necessary detail due to shutdown delays.

Methodology is at the forefront of blow-back from the White House touting the success of the American economy and the increased proliferation of native born workers, an assertion consistent with the Trump administration's goals of immigrant removal both legal, and illegal.

CNN reported that “The White House on Tuesday touted the latest employment figures as a sign of a “strong, American First economy,” highlighting gains in the private sector:

“Since President (Donald) Trump took office, 100% of the job growth has come in the private sector and among native-born Americans — exactly where it should be,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote Tuesday.” 

“Private-sector businesses have indeed driven job growth this year while public sector employment has declined – entirely because of steep federal workforce cuts by the Trump administration. From January through November, the US economy added 499,000 jobs: The private sector added 687,000 jobs and the government (federal, state and local) shed 188,000 jobs.”

With the midterm elections upcoming in a matter of months the administration is determined to show that there are job gains for the US, but as CNN added, “However, the pace of job growth has fallen off: The year-to-date employment gains – overall and private-sector – are the weakest since 2020 and, before that, the Great Recession.

Additionally, it’s impossible to attribute the monthly employment gains reported widely from the jobs report to any particular nativity or documentation status – labor force and demographic statistics are drawn from an entirely different survey than the monthly payroll numbers."

While some economists and observers see this as a shell game by the White House, it’s a sure bet with high stakes at maintaining a lead in the US House of Representatives they will want to put a best foot forward on what is a slowly leaking jobs market.

While the DOGE decimation of federal payrolls gave a strong hit to the report, combined with more workers holding part-time jobs because they could not find full-time work increased to 8.7%, its highest since August 2021, a concerning fact.

According to CNBC, “The October slump came from a steep fall in government employment as deferred layoffs instituted earlier this year took effect. Government payrolls were off 162,000 for the month, and fell an additional 6,000 in November."

Once again, the heavy hitters were health care, adding 46,000 jobs, with more than 70% of the total net increase, and construction added 28,000, while the umbrella label of social assistance showed 18,000.

It was also reported, “On the down side, transportation and warehousing was off 18,000, part of a continuing trend in job losses for the sector. Leisure and hospitality also posted a loss of 12,000.”

A significant reason for the steady and reliable hiring increases in health care are America’s aging population, and their reliable needs.

While hiring has slowed and in some cases been eliminated, the Trump White House paints a glowing picture: “The strong jobs report shows how President Trump is fixing the damage caused by Joe Biden and creating a strong, America First economy in record time,” Leavitt said in a statement adding that “Workers’ wages are rising, prices are falling, trillions of dollars in investments are pouring into our country, and the American economy is primed to boom in 2026.”

The Federal Reserve in creating a rate cut had a difficult path to follow and

the dilemma that Powell has faced, as we have noted many times before, is the balancing act between meeting the mandate of full employment with 2 percent inflation.

Inflation has rebounded from earlier years when it was over 3 percent, especially in the post pandemic world, the current rate is still high; and, is especially felt by low income Americans during their weekly grocery shopping;with many feeling that the president has not kept his campaign promise of lowering those prices, inasmuch as any president can.

“The Fed is unlikely to put much weight on today’s report given data disruptions,” said Kay Haigh, global co-head of fixed income and liquidity solutions at Goldman Sachs Asset Management. To CNBC, noting that,“The report on December’s employment data, released in early January ahead of the next meeting, will likely be a much more meaningful indicator for the Fed when it comes to deciding the near-term policy trajectory.”

Thursday offered a glimmer of hope with the CPI report that strips out volatile food and energy costs, and according to Yahoo Finance,“Inflation pressures eased more than expected in November, according to the latest data on consumer prices published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.”

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 2.7% over the prior year in November, less than the 3.1% increase that had been expected by economists, according to Bloomberg estimates.”

However, there is a cautionary note, “This looks like positive news overall, but the lack of detail and the absence of data collection during the shutdown introduce a degree of skepticism that’s hard to ignore," wrote Olu Sonola, head of US economic research at Fitch Ratings, in an email after the report,” but added that “Tariff pass through remains muted, even as companies stocked up on holiday imports facing higher duties. The Fed will welcome that trend, given its recent focus on cutting rates to support a softer labor market."

In his Wednesday night address to the nation, the president said, “Very importantly, there are more people working today than at any time in American history. And 100 percent of all jobs created since I took office have been in the private sector. Think of that, 100 percent of all jobs have been in the private sector rather than government, which is the only way to make a country powerful and great."

As was expected he trashed former President Biden and his handling of the economy, immigration and that the rest of the world laughed at us, and while we will leave the majority of fact checking to others, to say that Trump was on a stretch would not be an exaggeration.

“Already, I’ve secured a record-breaking $18 trillion of investment into the United States, which means jobs, wage increases, growth, factory openings and far greater national security. Much of this success has been accomplished by tariffs, my favorite word, tariffs, which for many decades have been used successfully by other countries against us, but not anymore.”

Tariffs have been the core of uncertainty by the nation’s employers and while the full effect may not be seen until January, this current fear can be seen in the November jobs report.

Taking a closer look,”Average hourly earnings rose just 0.1% for the month, below the estimate for 0.3%, and were up 3.5% from a year ago, the smallest annual gain since May 2021,” and "The 0.1 percentage point increase in the unemployment rate was largely a function of labor force growth.”

“The strong jobs report shows how President Trump is fixing the damage caused by Joe Biden and creating a strong, America First economy in record time,” Leavitt said in a statement, stating that, “Workers’ wages are rising, prices are falling, trillions of dollars in investments are pouring into our country, and the American economy is primed to boom in 2026.”

Steady consumer spending has been seen by high income earners, and while inflation has rebounded from earlier years when it was over 3 percent, especially in a post pandemic world, the current rate is still high, and is especially felt by low income Americans during their weekly grocery shopping; and, many are feeling that the president has not kept his campaign promise of lowering those prices, inasmuch as any president can.

A recent PBS/NPR/Marist poll showed Trump taking a direct hit by Americans who feel that he has failed them, with 55 percent of those polled disapproving of the way he is handling the economy.

December rate cut: A holiday gift from the Federal Reserve

Wednesday's rate cut by the Federal Reserve had been anticipated by some in our earlier coverage, but seeing is believing, and that news came with no data from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics due to the government shutdown, so the Federal Opens Market Committee made the decision with one armed tied behind their collective backs.

Consequently they also faced the dilemma of trying to meet its mandate of full employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent creating division among its members, with some saying hold back on a cut, and full steam ahead by others, creating a first for that body.

The drop in the rate went down to a range: 3.5 to 3.75, to 0.25 percentage points. And The Hill reported that, “The FOMC approved the rate cut by a vote of 9 to 3, a smaller margin than the typical Fed rate decision. Fed board member Stephen Miran preferred to cut rates by 0.5 percentage points, while Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Austan Goolsbee and Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid called for no cut at all.”

It should be no surprise that Miran, an ally of President Trump, wanted the larger cuts a bone of contention between the president and Federal Reserve head Jerome Powell.

Even allowing for a plurality of views, “The unusual number and nature of Wednesday’s dissents revealed how hard it could be for Fed Chair Jerome Powell — and his eventual successor — to keep the FOMC united with the economy at a foggy crossroads” reported The Hill and added,”The last time three FOMC members voted against a Fed move was in September 2019, when the Fed cut interest rates to unwind a series of previous increases meant to stave off inflation that never materialized."

At Wednesday’s press conference, Powell said,“Everyone agrees that inflation is too high, and we want it to come down, and agree that the labor market has softened and that there’s further risk. Everyone agrees on that.” 

Other reports from officials say that inflation might be acceptable at 3 percent as a new standard, yet that shift might be more philosophical than reflection of a true policy, beyond the traditional mandate of the Federal Reserve.

With perhaps the greatest understatement he added: “Where the difference is, is how do you weigh those risks? And what does your forecast look like?”

Powell’s term ends in May of 2026, and Trump is expected to name his successor in the near future; and, it’s no secret that the two have differed on the role and size of rate cuts, and the president did give some of his characteristic verbal bludgeoning to the Chair for the past several months.

The dilemma that Powell has faced, as we have noted many times before, is the balancing act between meeting the mandate and taking stock of inflation, plus the adjoining employment rate. While inflation has rebounded from earlier years when it was over 3 percent, especially in a post pandemic world, the current rate is still high, and is especially felt by low income Americans during their weekly grocery shopping; and, many are feeling that the president has not kept his campaign promise of lowering those prices, inasmuch as any president can.

Meanwhile employment has remained resilient, if shaky, in the face of economic uncertainty, mostly attributable to the billions of dollars in tariffs imposed by the president, what an earlier era called protectionism; and, the effect on hiring is significant as employers are trying to make do with what they have on payroll, and increasing hiring only when necessary, creating a slowdown in many areas, health care and hospitality excepted.

Consumer confidence has taken a hit, as are the poll ratings for the president now at 36 percent. And, while he has portrayed affordability as a Democratic hoax, the reality of higher prices and the ever increasing costs of housing have many American working families deeply worried about their economic future, not to mention meeting monthly bills, and feeding their children.

There is some optimism by some economists that consumer spending is steady but it;s important to note, as we did last month, that the increased spending is supported by high income earners, but lower income individuals and families face the above challenges, thus the infamous K shaped economy.

Currently it is estimated that there is $150 billion in tariff money sitting in reserve and the the president has said that some might be given to Americans in the form of a check, or to help pay for health care, but economists don’t see that as a viable option in either case, with the latter forcing people to confront, on their own, the behemoth of American health care giants.

The role of politics cannot be underestimated in examining the American economy but there are fears that many hardworking Americans may be caught in the middle.

On Thursday there were the initial jobless claims and while there was an increase to the tune of 236,000 and allowing for some holiday volatility, following previously lower numbers of 191,000, there are cautionary notes, according to Claudia Sahm, a former Fed economist, who told Fortune magazine that, “Initial claims don’t give you a sense of what’s coming,” she said. They’re what economists like to call a lagging indicator, meaning they tend to spike after a recession is underway, not before it. Recent weekly readings, distorted by holidays and special factors, are even less informative.”

Nevertheless, as Yahoo Finance reported, “Weekly initial claims tend to be choppy around the holidays and will likely continue to fluctuate through the end of the year, but Thursday’s figures are toward the higher end of readings seen in 2025. Companies like PepsiCo Inc. and HP Inc. have laid out plans to reduce headcount in recent weeks, and nationwide layoffs in October were the highest since early 2023.”

The future is on the minds of many and Powell, playing close to the vest, feels at best that shifting into neutral gear may be the best option but then again, as The New York Times opined, ”If there are signs that the unemployment rate might surge, that would probably prompt more officials to embrace the need to cut rates. So far, though, most policymakers do not appear worried, nor do they appear to be downbeat about growth. Projections released on Wednesday showed that most officials expected the unemployment rate to peak at 4.5 percent in 2025, before declining.”

Tariffs are still on the chart and it seems that Powell, and others, are waiting for the first quarter of 2026 to make an assessment, perhaps a code word for “wait and see.”

Updated on December 15, 2025

.

September Jobs Report: Come and Gone

If you missed the September Jobs report released by the US Labor Dept last week you are not alone with the competing news of Ukraine Peace deals, the burgeoning case with the pressure to release the Epstein films and broadsides from President Trump, it was easy to miss; but, now, with the Thanksgiving holiday a day away it’s time to hit the refresh button on what the American economy looks like, now that the government is open and the tabulators had enough data, due to that impasse to gain a windfall as employers hit the submit button for increased data collection.

To be brief, it’s still resilient, as the good news was continued with 119,000 non farm jobs, much more than expected, and an unemployment rate of 4.4 percent, the marquee rate, as we prefer to call it, and even the household survey showed a steady pace with the big numbers for the health care industry, and the steady drain of manufacturing.

What beckons in mid December at the Federal Reserve Meeting, where economists are predicting that there will be no rate cut, because of this stable report and the market has been strong, so there seems to be no calls on Wall Street for a rate cut.

According to Reuters, “Some economists viewed the rise in the jobless rate as bolstering the argument for another Federal Reserve interest rate cut next month, while others said the better-than-expected job growth suggested the U.S. central bank should stay pat, especially since policymakers would not get another employment report before the December 9-10 meeting.”

While the September report, released late November, because of the shutdown, and the less probable release of October’s report, the Fed is at a disadvantage without the usual complete data, and the chances that the president might, or might not make a move to install his own at the Bureau of Labor and Statistics after he fired to the former head; but, with foreign wars, and interventions beckoning from afar, and Trump might punt on this appointment.

The good news is that wages increased at the same rate of 0.2 percent and 3.8 over the years but some see murky waters ahead with not only the absence of October but the revisions of July and August of 33,000 but, it’s equally important to realize that revisions are standard for BLS.

Layoffs are not seeing an increase but then again a surge of new hires is not occurring, but as is common knowledge tariffs, and their on again, off again have taken a toll on the business community, especially small business with employees under 500 employees, with where most Americans are employed and who don’t have the heft that the big retailers, such as Walmart have in negotiating lower tarrifs, and there are some who are worried in that community. It’s a given that business markets don’t like uncertainty, and the end game from the White House has not been evident.

One area that is still showing growth and that is restaurants and bars hitting 37,000 new hires but as economists have pointed out this is mostly supported by high income earners, and as reported this is a K shaped economy with those at the top of the bar with high incomes and those at the bottom with lower wages leaving an empty middle. 

With grocery prices still high at major markets, American working families are struggling to stay afloat with rent, mortgage payments and child care and the theme of affordability, seen in the New York mayoral race won the day for Zohran Mandami and now that term has entered the economic as well as political realm.

A common theme is that to maintain economic parity 100,000 jobs need to be maintained each month, but with cautious employers citing tariff uncertainty as a factor it’s an open question if that can be maintained.

"These changes complicate traditional interpretations of job numbers, but also point toward a labor market undergoing gradual, not chaotic, transformation," said Sung Won Sohn, a finance and economics professor at Loyola Marymount University. "The key question for the year ahead is whether the economy can maintain this delicate equilibrium,” according to Reuters.

One category, professional services and temporary workers, once a boom in the 1980s, has taken a nose dive with September showing a decrease of 13,000. Of course in competition with health care, it looks puny, but some are hoping that post holiday numbers might increase but others noting that any hiring in the retail sector has already been done, and stress that historically those workers are laid off in January.

Full time workers may have gained a bump of 675,000 and part time with 575,000 and a slight reduction in those working part time, but preferring full time, give some hope to some economic observers, but notably there was an increase of those unemployed for 26 weeks, or more.

“September’s jobs report shows the labor market still had resilience before the shutdown, beating payroll expectations, but the picture remains muddy with August jobs revised to a job loss and the unemployment rate increasing,” said Daniel Zhao, chief economist at jobs site Glassdoor. “These numbers are a snapshot from two months ago and they don’t reflect where we stand now in November.” told CNBC, thus complicating the work of the Fed in December.

US Government is open, but headwinds created

It was all over but for the fighting with the longest government shutdown in American history, 43 days to be exact, but the infighting after the standoff by the Democrats anxious to extend the federal subsidies for the Affordable Care Act, colloquially known as Obamacare, ended last Wednesday with defect eight Democratic senators voting with Republicans to end the shutdown after the GOP played its end game of refusing to budge on the expiring subsidies and blaming the Democrats.

For those living outside the Beltway, that might very well have been believed, but if belief is to be believed then the GOP did win the upper hand, and with so many unpaid government officials, especially the air traffic controllers, lines of cars at Washington area food banks of unpaid federal workers for groceries to  feed their families, this seemed to be a victory for the GOP; and President Trump, as he focused on foreign policy leaving Senate Majority leader John Thune to steer the ship, with Speaker of the House Mike Johnson as the ensign.

In the aftermath, while much of the Democratic base wailed and bemoaned at the defection, stagecraft was in play as those eight defectors, Sen. Dick Durbin leading, were not up for reelection, and they knew that they had no political capital to lose.

So there was no bright morning to wake up to for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to see, but there was plenty of rumor, and that he had secretly encouraged the defectors, but there is scant evidence of that, and in a town, and at a time, where political gamesmanship is key, married to innuendo, that is anyone's guess.

What remains is a party who lost the White House, is now facing growing anger by younger Dems, especially in the light of the mayoral victory of the 34-year-old Zohran Mandami in New York and a much younger cadre of progressive group of Democratic leaders inspired by his energy and what was his very successful campaign.

There was however internal dissension among Democrats on the best course of action in the shutdown debacle and now that is now out in the open, and there are those who are putting Schumer in the cross-hairs.

“This is likely going to be problematic for 2026 Senate candidates who are going to be asked whether or not they’ll vote for Schumer and whether or not they endorse his leadership,” said Rodell Mollineau, a former top aide to the late Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and a partner at ROKK Strategies”, reported The Hill.

“It’s not the voters, it’s the groups,” he continued. “They’re very upset with Schumer because even though he voted the right way, they believe he had a hand in the agreement to end the shutdown.”

His vote in March to support the GOP continuing resolution, earned him enmity, and now that anger will be doubled.

“It’s becoming very clear who is running as institutionalists and who is running as an anti-institutionalist — establishment [and] anti-establishment,” one Democratic operative involved in Senate races this cycle. “My bet is the establishment feeling candidates are going to have a very hard time next year because every time something big happens, eventually Schumer and the establishment let down the base, and they will get their anger taken out on [them].”

What did the Democrats gain? Some say the spotlight on insurance in the ACA that has supported 64 percent of Americans, and the willingness of Trump and his party to see people go hungry, but it seems that they had looked at the calculus closely, and predicted the Dems would cave. And, despite the expansion of Medicaid to those low income people under 65, the GOP knew many of their supporters in those states on that and other public benefits, voted for Trump, so “win a few lose a few" seemed to be their mantra.

The falling poll numbers for the president, now with 40 percent support, according to Reuters might be a bellwether of things to come, notably the easing of tariffs on coffee and bananas, a teaser of sorts to keep the loyalists but, with the midterm elections in sight can the White House afford to give so little?

Enter the culture wars and the SNAP snafu, as Trump stated that people were leaving their jobs to get SNAP, while that is hardly the truth, he has established a pattern of throwing things to the wall, to see what sticks.

Notably, even old guard Republicans hated SNAP, what to mid century folks was known as food stamps, hated the very idea of them, going back to the Nixon administration, and with work requirements in place in some states, they are now looking at permanent cuts and USDA head Brooke Rollins has already made news saying that there is widespread fraud and hinting at even more stringent safeguards and program requirements for recipients.

Politico reported that “The Trump administration will require millions of low-income people to reapply for food stamps as part of an effort to crack down on “fraud,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said.

Rollins told Newsmax on Thursday that she plans to “have everyone reapply for their benefits, make sure that everyone that’s taking a taxpayer-funded benefit through ... food stamps, that they literally are vulnerable and they can’t survive without it.”

“She did not provide further information on when or how people would need to reapply.”

We remember President Reagan and his speech about the “welfare queen” driving to the public aid office in her Cadillac to get food stamps; showing that in politics, the past is indeed prologue.

“SNAP fraud can occur when participants intentionally lie about their qualifications for the program, retailers exchange benefits for cash or criminals skim EBT cards for benefits, per USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service. But anti-hunger groups say there’s not nearly as much fraud as the Trump administration alleges and note that SNAP only issues about $6 a day in benefits to the average participant,” they added.

The cost of the program is $100 billion in fiscal year 2024 is low hanging fruit for an administration looking for ways to cut expenses.

Of course, the elephant in the room is the extension of the ACA subsidies, and while the GOP and the Speaker supported the White House and nearly every other official claiming that illegal immigrants were taking the benefits despite federal laws not permitting it, the claim was a constant talking point among administration officials.

However on Sunday there seemed to be a change of mind with “Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), said Sunday the Trump administration is holding “discussions” on extending subsidies offered under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). 

“There are discussions around extending the subsidies, if we deal with the fraud, waste and abuse that, right now, is paralyzing the system,” Oz told host Dana Bash on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

Taking a wider lens there is the substantiated claim that “The majority of fraud that Oz is referencing concerns agents, brokers, web brokers and third parties that enroll individuals in the ACA marketplace, according to health policy research group KFF

Cynics might say that if this is known why didn’t the Trump administration examine this earlier rather than have some individuals and families paying on average, for the lowest plan an increase of $50 a month.

The Trojan Horse, for the Democrats, is the Epstein affair, and the files that have not been fully released, and the recent shot over the judicial bow was Trump ordering an investigation against, but unproven, for former President Bill Clinton but, on Sunday, as mounting pressure from his own party to release the files, he “called on House Republicans to vote to release files linked to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, reversing his previous position.

Trump’s announcement came amid signs that a vote this week on a measure forced by a discharge petition might have won dozens of Republican votes despite the president’s opposition,” according to a late Sunday report by The Hill.

“As I said on Friday night aboard Air Force One to the Fake News Media, House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party, including our recent Victory on the Democrat ‘Shutdown,’” the president wrote in the Sunday night post on his Truth Social platform.”

Avoiding political embarrassment seems to be the goal, and considering, “the House would vote on the underlying measure forced by the petition this week. Several sponsors, including Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), predicted dozens of Republicans would vote for it on the floor. Massie specifically predicted 100 GOP members could back it.”

As the old cliche states, “it’s not over till it’s over.”